In fact, this is a rhetorical question, but perhaps the whole point is that social elements lead an active, sometimes promiscuous sex life without contraception, starting from a young age, when the ovaries are active, there are no gynecological ailments and nothing prevents you from easily getting pregnant ... A woman who is planning a pregnancy and making such a decision consciously often comes to him after 35 years, when there is an education, career, housing, etc., but unfortunately the follicular reserve is already reduced, there is endometriosis, chronic inflammation and other problems. Another very important factor is the control of the situation, which is inherent in women who have problems with conception. A lot of examinations, ovulation control, sex life by the hour, until recently, also such a monster as the study of basal temperature🤦♀️. The brain is busy with many important things and it can no longer cope with pregnancy, if it comes, it gives a signal to remove this extra "load" that prevents it from controlling the situation. After all, pregnancy is a really aggressive factor for the body, with which it begins to fight from the very beginning and the immune system has to reduce its activity in order to keep the baby. As an example, I can cite the situation that the best pregnant women in the HRT program are women who do not speak the language well (foreign patients), or do not have higher education and do not think about the process of what the doctor does with them, but only follow his recommendations. They almost always succeed in everything the first time, in contrast to responsible women who control their every step. And sometimes everything works out after a person finally relaxes, lets go of the situation, stops planning - and here it is, the long-awaited conception, without any IVF, despite years of ineffective protocols, operations, etc. There are a great many such wonderful stories, and how to explain them except for the absence of a "load" on the brain is difficult to say ...
That's right. I decided to write to you because I recently witnessed a similar discussion in my life. Two doctors (a pediatrician and a gynecologist) were outraged that children are born in large numbers to mothers who do not need children. They give birth to them: a) for the sake of maternity capital; b) by flight; c) to "keep" the man. In fact, children for them are a bargaining chip for their own benefits. All! And after that, such mothers do not pay any attention to their offspring or beat them physically and mentally, moreover, it is even clear that this child, due to the lack of love and constant violence, will later grow up as an asocial element.
In contrast, women who want children and lovers who cannot get pregnant and go to eco-friendly or are generally barren, although they really want a baby and can give him a happy future (there is a husband, there is money, there is health) was discussed ... Several good families were cited as an example in which children are very much expected, but cannot ... These are the pies.
And on my own behalf, I can add a third category of women (and men too): responsible. After all, children are not a doll, not a thing, not a toy. Responsible people will not even take a dog, because they are afraid that they will not be able to give her love as needed, to provide for everyone, to educate, and then to start a person! As a result, they postpone until victorious.
In general, if we draw some conclusion from everything I heard, then I would say the following: the less a woman is developed as a person, a person, the more she strives to achieve something life in a biological way: to give birth to more children in order to receive money, alimony, an apartment, discounts, a special attitude from other people, some bonuses (as you understood, all mothers derive from this category of women), while the children themselves are for them - the goods. The more a woman is developed as a person and a person, the more she asks herself questions about "what can I give my children?", "What will I teach them?", "Who should become their father?" And she goes to get an education, gets a profession, works, chooses the same thinking man, and then ... her time runs out, since the ovarian reserve is not infinite. As a result, the country is flooded with the offspring of destructive asocial elements and residents of near Asia ...
I finished my reasoning and realized that I sympathize with those whose children will live in this terrible future. And they will be normal people from good, decent and loving families.