Honey is no better. Despite its "naturalness", you can die from quincke and not notice it. At the same time, eating up banal sugar, in the worst case scenario, will earn hyperglycemia and possible complications. As well as honey at its best.
(the following is a shortened version of the English-language article - in the article for each item there is an explanation and links to some other articles and studies)
What do honey and sugar have in common?
Both are carbohydrates, which are made up of two types of sugar: glucose and fructose.
Refined fructose processed by the liver, and is often associated with obesity, diabetes and liver steatosis (the latter is not sure what I translated correctly, I don't know the Russian name of the disease).
Both glucose and fructose are easily broken down by the body and can cause jumps in blood sugar .
The proportion of glucose and fructose in sugar and honey is different.
Sugar is 50% one 50% another. Honey is about 40% glucose and 30% sucrose, the rest is water, pollen, and minerals (including potassium and magnesium). These additional components may be responsible for the health benefits of honey.
Blood sugar rises faster from using pure sugar. This is due to its high fructose content and lack of trace minerals.
Honey contains more calories.
Now in detail.
I have been eating ten spoons a day for six months now, I have no health problems. Others write differently .. Is it true that the benefits of honey are an imposed stereotype and, in fact, it contains a minimum of useful substances?