Where did the myth about the incredible harm of ultrasound for the unborn child come from and how is it explained?

Where did the myth about the incredible harm of ultrasound for the unborn child come from and how is it explained?

Shocking Speech, How Young You Are? by Dr. B M Hegde | Reductionist Science

Previous questionI went to see a doctor 2 times. You pay money for the reception. The therapy didn't work. Do I always have to pay for each appointment? Maybe they do it on purpose?
Next questionIs it normal that every time after wine my lips dry in the morning? Today they are so dry that they cracked my lip straight to blood.

answers (6)

Answer 1
September, 2021

I am an ultrasound doctor. In my practice, there have been cases when women believed that they had a miscarriage after an ultrasound scan, only because the transvaginal examination stimulated the appearance of bloody discharge (miscarriage). But the pregnancy, as a rule, was already frozen.
The fact is that while a woman does not see the discharge, she believes that everything is in order. So the association with the harm of ultrasound has turned out - that the study supposedly can provoke a miscarriage.

Answer 2
September, 2021

In theory, harm can be found in anything from pills to diagnostic procedures. It is necessary to look at specific research, if ultrasound did more harm than good, I think it has long ceased to be used. All in all, I graduated from medical school, and I will tell you that there is nothing to worry about. More details can be found here https://vrachonkolog.msk.ru/uslugi/uzi/

Answer 3
September, 2021

This myth has several reasons: 1. Doctors of ultrasound are paid a premium for harm, which means it is harmful. In fact, it is only harmful to doctors. Harmful factors - working with a monitor and working in a dark room. 2. Ultrasound scares away rats and insects. 3. The fetus hears ultrasound and does not like it. It really is. Children try to cover their ears with pens during the exploration and begin to spin.

Answer 4
September, 2021

Incredible harm - I don't know, it's emotions. And just to understand, let's turn to what is available to people, what they will encounter when trying to read about ultrasound on their own.

Please open the Rossiyskaya Gazeta and read an article with a link to a refereed scientific journal.

Not good?

There is an FDA in the US - the Food and Drug Administration.

Read.

http://www.fda.gov/Radiation-EmittingProducts/RadiationEmittingProductsandProcedures/MedicalImaging/ucm115357.htm

http://www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ConsumerUpdates/ucm095508 .htm

## Benefits / Risks

## ...

## Although ultrasound imaging is generally considered safe when used prudently by appropriately trained health care providers, ultrasound energy has the potential to produce biological effects on the body. Ultrasound waves can heat the tissues slightly. In some cases, it can also produce small pockets of gas in body fluids or tissues (cavitation). The long-term consequences of these effects are still unknown. Because of the particular concern for effects on the fetus, organizations such as the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine disclaimer icon have advocated prudent use of ultrasound imaging in pregnancy. Furthermore, the use of ultrasound solely for non-medical purposes such as obtaining fetal 'keepsake' videos has been discouraged. Keepsake images or videos are reasonable if they are produced during a medically-indicated exam, and if no additional exposure is required.

Google translation:

Research is generally considered safe when used prudently by appropriately trained health care providers, and ultrasound energy has the potential to produce biological effects on the body. Ultrasonic waves may heat up tissue slightly. In some cases, they can also produce small pockets of gas in fluid or body tissues (cavitation). The long-term effects of these effects are still unknown. Because of their particular concern for the effects on the fetus, organizations such as the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine have warned of a disclaimer advocating the judicious use of ultrasound during pregnancy. In addition, the use of ultrasound solely for non-medical purposes such as obtaining a Keepsake fetal video is discouraged. Keepsake images or videos are reasonable if they are from medical research and no additional exposure is required.

## Information for Patients including Expectant Mothers

## In fetal ultrasound, three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound allows the visualization of some facial features and possibly other parts such as fingers and toes of the fetus. Four-dimensional (4D) ultrasound is 3D ultrasound in motion. While ultrasound is generally considered to be safe with very low risks, the risks may increase with unnecessary prolonged exposure to ultrasound energy, or when untrained users operate the device.

## Expectant mothers should also be aware of purchasing over-the-counter fetal heartbeat monitoring systems (also called doptones). These devices should only be used by trained health care providers when medically necessary. Use of these devices by untrained persons could expose the fetus to prolonged and unsafe energy levels, or could provide information that is interpreted incorrectly by the user.

For fetal ultrasound, three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound allows visualize some of the facial features and possibly other details such as the fetus's fingers and toes. Four-dimensional (4D) ultrasound is 3D ultrasound in motion. While ultrasound is generally considered safe with very low risks, risks may increase with unnecessary prolonged exposure to ultrasonic energy, or when an inexperienced user operates the device. Pregnant women should also be aware of the purchase of non-prescription fetal heart rate monitoring systems (also called doptones). These devices should only be used by trained healthcare professionals for medical reasons. The use of these devices by untrained individuals may expose the fetus to prolonged and dangerous levels of energy, or may provide information that is misinterpreted by the user.

Is ultrasound a completely neutral, safe examination for any gestational age? No . This method is relatively safe for certain periods of time and using serviceable equipment with limited power and exposure time.

Answer 5
September, 2021

People do not understand well what ultrasound is, and understand ultrasound as a kind of radiation (like in X-ray diagnostics - and it is really recommended to use it with caution during pregnancy and avoid it if possible).

Answer 6
September, 2021

I think it will be difficult to find the original source of the myth. although I roughly understand the root cause of its occurrence. This myth is insanely popular among people influenced by any mysticism and with serious problems with critical thinking. As an example, raw foodists, alternative historians, crazy mothers who don't leave the forums, opponents of technocracy and everyone else armed with social networks and foil hats. It seems to me that Kiril Repyev stands out very much. He is, in general, a good freak, it is easy to find him in VK :).

The explanations of this nonsense are different. But like most "fighters for the truth" they argue this with the bioenergetic field, the memory of water and other nonsense, and I am always interested in how they found the biofield at all. This very bioenergetic field is often considered as an element of the Vernandian bio / noosphere, and sometimes as its source. Moreover, let the fans of the Russian cosmists forgive me, but Vernandsky whistled, but as an intelligent man, he understood that most of this was his fantasy and assumed, not asserted. It is from his works that one can trace the roots of myths about prano-eating, the spiritual evolution of man and the achievement in the future, of his physiological perfection. Simply put, a free interpretation of his writings formed the basis of all these discussions about the biofield and evolution towards the superman. And what does the ultrasound have to do with it? Despite the fact that Vernandsky was not a transhumanist, his perfection was achieved not by technical achievements, but by internal forces. He did not deny technical progress, but the freaks who dug up his works somewhere drew conclusions, they say we don't need technology, which means it is harmful. I am always amused how they make others on the basis of some dubious statements, and then they end up with a beautiful theory that is internally perfectly consistent.

To summarize, I will try to give a similar logical chain that will allow you to understand guys. Mysticism and conspiracy theories for beginners.

1. The planet is evolving from the biosphere to the noosphere. Man is the flagship of developments, the next stage of evolution is the rejection of food and the transition to feeding on the sun and space energy, the achievement of this will be through human development, not technical progress, but this is not certain. VI Vernandsky (the interpretation is free, I apologize in advance.)

2. The noosphere is created by man, the noosphere, once a sphere, is something like a field of the earth. Moreover, this is perfectly consistent with the concept of aura, that is, this field emanating from a living, biofield .... Delightful.

3.Aura or biofield develops in a person from birth, with the development of a person, eo bioenergy potential. Since a person does not need technical progress to achieve perfection, the technical process is harmful.

4. All the achievements of civilization, everything that is created artificially is aimed at the destruction of man. A person has a biofield, which cannot be immoral, it is by nature. And nature is good, it means that a person is kind by nature, and he will come up with a techniquel someone bad, most likely they are not from our planet.

5. Damn reptilians! First, they destroyed their civilization with a bomb, justified everything with a meteorite, then they prevented us from standing on our feet throughout the history of mankind, they even destroyed Atlantis, and now, with the help of ultrasound, they disfigure the biofield of mothers and our children!

Related question

Is the division of the brain hemispheres into those responsible for "creativity" and "logic" a myth? Where did this belief come from?

Read more

Where did the child's organs (heart, brain, etc.) come from in the mother's belly - out of nowhere?

Read more

Is it harmful to crunch your fingers and toes, and where does the crunch come from?

Read more

Monochorionic vs Dichorionic Twin Pregnancy

Where did the fashion for a nose ring come from? Why is it so popular now?

Read more

Where did the theories about reincarnation come from, are there any logical explanations or arguments in favor of it?

Read more

Is cigarette smoke harmful to the environment and where does it go after it comes out of all the smoker's openings? No need to write about the harm of gases from cars.

Read more

Why is the menstrual cycle in women about 28 days? Where did this number come from?

Read more

Where did the Ebola virus come from and why is it so dangerous?

Read more

Pregnancy 101 | National Geographic

Why is it harder for men to cry? And where did the expression "Men don't cry" come from?

Read more

Where does such incredible confidence in their righteousness, in their knowledge and understanding of the structure of something come from in people of a narrow mind?

Read more

Where did the fashion for selfharm come from?

Read more

Is it true that female alcoholism is not cured, and where did this phrase come from?

Read more

How realistic is it to find out the sex of the child using ultrasound at 13 weeks of pregnancy?

Read more

What Happens In The Womb Can Last A Lifetime - Begin Before Birth

Is it possible to influence the sex of the unborn child?

Read more

Where and when did masturbation come from?

Read more

And where did the tradition of calling "night butterflies" come from in baths and saunas, that now it is even included in the services of these establishments?

Read more

How did the idea for the Sekta School come about?

Read more

How can you find out the predisposition of your unborn child to illness?

Read more

3D-4D ultrasounds worth potential risk to your unborn child?

Is it true that the harm from drinking while eating is a myth?

Read more

Where did the 90-60-90 standard come from?

Read more