Should reason prevail over feelings?

Should reason prevail over feelings?

Facing a Satanic Attack – Dr. Charles Stanley

Previous questionHow can you quickly cure herpes on the lip?
Next questionWhich came first, language or thinking?

answers (4)

Answer 1
January, 2021

There is an excellent book "How We Make Decisions" by John Lehrer. The essence of the book is that you need to unite mind and feelings. Sometimes it is worth letting the mind think, sometimes the feelings. Since the idea that "The best ideas cannot be chosen by feelings is a myth. The author tells how sometimes an emotional choice can be better than a rational one. Since even our rational thinking is not so rational. I advise you to read, after reading you will only have to decide when it is worth taking over the mind, and when to give the choice to your emotions

Answer 2
January, 2021

To be happy, indulge your passions, desires and fleeting impulses.
The unfortunate will only have a hopeless road of wisdom, knowing which they will never be able to return.

Answer 3
January, 2021

As an answer, I will give an excerpt from the workshop on Gestalt psychology. It makes it clear that reason and feeling are not really opposed to each other.

Emotion is an ongoing process; every moment of life has a somewhat perceptible tone of pleasantness or unpleasantness. However, since in modern people this continuity of emotional experience is most often excluded from awareness, emotions are viewed as a kind of periodic outbursts that incomprehensibly arise in behavior precisely in those cases when a person would like to "control himself."

Such intrusions - so "unjustified" - are frightening and make you stay on your guard. As much as possible, people try to avoid situations where they arise.

Most, however, agreeing with this use of the term "emotion" only for such "explosive" situations, knows about the existence of other phenomena, in many ways similar, but not so frightening. They are commonly referred to as "feelings", so the scientific descriptions of this whole area are called "Feelings and Emotions." We believe that this separates what is actually a continuum. What determines the place of a given emotional experience in this continuum depends on the degree to which the interest of the organism experiencing the gestalt "organism / environment" manifests itself from the background in the figure.

Emotion, considered as a direct value experience of the organism of the field "organism / environment", is not mediated by thoughts and verbal judgments, it is immediate. In this capacity, it is a decisive regulator of action, for it not only forms the basis of awareness of what is important, but also gives energy to the corresponding action or, if action is impossible, gives energy and direction to the search for action.

In a primitive undifferentiated form, emotion is simply excitement-excitement, increased metabolic activity and increased energy mobilization, which is the body's response to the experience of novelty or stimulation in a situation. In newborns, this response is holistic and relatively undifferentiated. As the child gradually differentiates the world, he accordingly differentiates his general arousal-excitement into selective, situationally polarized excitations. They take on the names of specific emotions.

Emotions as such are not vague and diffuse; they are just as differentiated in structure and function as the person experiencing them is differentiated. If a person experiences his emotions as vague and rough, then these terms can be attributed to him. From this it follows that emotions in themselves are not something to get rid of on the basis of the fiction that they interfere with the clarity of thought and action. On the contrary, they are not only important as regulators of energy in the "organism / environment" field, but are also irreplaceable carriers of a certain experience - our interest, what we care aboutra and to yourself.

These functions of emotion are highly distorted in our society. As already mentioned, it is believed that emotions arise only in moments of crisis, and then only if a person “loses control over himself” and then “becomes emotional”. Equanimity is valued as the antithesis of emotion; people tend to seem "cold, calm, collected." But calmness itself is not devoid of an emotional tone, when it is born from a direct evaluating experience of this particular situation as one that you can confidently deal with, or - at the other extreme - as a situation in which nothing can be done.

Only a mobile, open situation in which something is at stake for a person and his own actions affect her balance can cause real excitement. Pretending to be calm in such a situation is like putting on a mask that suppresses manifestations of interest. Fooling others in this way can be helpful if they are enemies, but what is the point of mistaking for an enemy and fooling yourself, depriving yourself of the awareness of “what is being done”?

A number of "negative feelings" are usually denied emotional significance. However, for example, things like frigidity or boredom are very strong feelings, not just lack of feeling. The experience of cold is as real as the experience of warmth. The lack of sensitivity where it is supposed to be is, paradoxically, an overwhelmingly powerful feeling - so strong that it is soon excluded from the realm of the conscious. This is why it is so difficult to find gaps and restore sensitivity in these experiments.

Children's emotions - because of the inconvenience they cause to adults who have worked so hard to suppress the awareness of their own emotions - are prevented from natural development and differentiation. "Adults" are unaware and begin to deny if told that their anxiety about a child gaining "control over their emotions" is rooted precisely in the fact that in their own childhood "authorities" also cautiously distorted their own emotions. They themselves did not get the opportunity to adequately differentiate their childhood emotions and outgrow them without external coercion. They only suppressed them - and they continue to do so! When a child behaves spontaneously, it arouses the same latent tendencies in adults and threatens the diligently maintained "maturity" of their own behavior. As a result, children are forced to suppress their feelings as early as possible and once and for all put on a false mask of accepted "self-control".

This is largely achieved by bringing to the fore the "outside world" and its demands as reality, while the voice of organic needs, perceived through proprioception, is largely neglected as something "in the mind only." The child adapts to this continuous pressure, his body sensation becomes dim, and hedevotes whatever interest he manages to the outside world.

This whole crusade for "controlling emotions" has, of course, its own emotional basis and is very emotional. It cannot be said that he did not achieve results, but these results are not at all the ones mentioned in the justification of the entire program. "Unwanted" emotions are not at all excluded from the personality, because it is impossible to undo the way nature organizes the functioning of the organism. Achieved only further complication of the already tangled field "organism / environment" by creating a large number of situations, which, if not avoided, cause a strong discharge of emotions.

For example, if a “properly brought up” person in a certain situation “loses power over himself” and spontaneously discharges what has accumulated in him, this itself will be the basis for such very painful emotions as shame, annoyance, feelings of humiliation, self-pity, confusion, disgust, etc. To prevent a repetition of such a demoralizing experience, he will constrict his self-control to even more stifling restrictions.

This constitutes the apparent success that can be achieved in achieving "mastery of emotions." The following happens: certain emotions, before they reach the level of organization of action, or even before they reach awareness, are muffled and demobilized by the counter-emotions they cause; all this together forms a dead end. a dead center that is more or less effectively eliminated from awareness. Awareness of this unattractive position in oneself brings back painful conflict, confusion, anxiety and "dangerous" excitement. But if you refuse to recognize this as an existing state of affairs, it will not become available for change, it will remain hopelessly self-reproducing.

Answer 4
January, 2021

Reason must prevail. Not instincts, but reason. At any time, you can think about and act better and more competently than acting impulsively and stupidly.
Briefly and clearly.

Related question

Should reason prevail over feelings?

Read more

What literary works do you know where reason prevails over feelings?

Read more

I rarely smoke, but often after a cigarette strange sad thoughts come over me. What is the reason for this?

Read more

Jim McKelvey on How Square Defeated Amazon

What could be the reason for the constant feeling of hunger?

Read more

For what reasons do men over thirty increase sexual activity if there have been no changes in diet, habits, lifestyle?

Read more

What is the reason why the tattoo loses its black color over time and takes on a dark green color?

Read more

At what sugar level does a person feel hungry? What other reasons could be for this?

Read more

Can a knee brace be worn over jeans (if it's for everyday use) or over sweatpants (if it's for running) or should it be under clothing?

Read more

You aren't at the mercy of your emotions -- your brain creates them | Lisa Feldman Barrett

What is the reason for the feeling of anxiety - "Lump in the soul" and how to get rid of it?

Read more

I feel like a squeezed lemon, what should I do?

I have worked tirelessly all my life. Now I'm 59, it's time to take on myself, but everything seems to be fine with my health, but I feel like a squeezed lemon. The eyes do not look at anything. Tell me what it is, maybe there is a remedy for this?

Read more

Who tried chifir? How does it feel? Should you try?

Read more

Should the average person consume vitamins separately if their diet is relatively monotonous? And should you even bother with vitamins for no medical reason?

Read more

Why am I worried for no reason? I solved all my problems, but I still feel anxiety.

Read more

The Problem With Being Too Logical in Love

Should you try drugs? If so, which is better? If not, what is the reason for this?

Read more

How should you be tested for tumor markers if you care about your health? Should these tests be taken at all for no apparent reason?

Read more

Should you go to a psychotherapist in the absence of empathy, emotional coldness for no apparent reason?

Read more

I feel worthless. I'm tired of working, but at the same time I feel bad at home, especially in the evenings. Feeling useless. What should I do?

Read more

How do you feel about the fact that the vital drug mezatone is no longer supplied from Ukraine to Russia, and most likely for political reasons?

Read more

Logic Vs Emotion: How To Win The Battle And Make Better Decisions Every Day

Feeling that there is not enough air. Which doctor should I go to?

I take a breath, but it seems not full. I don't have enough air, I often yawn. This makes you feel dizzy from time to time.

Read more

What dietary supplements / vitamins / other supplements should everyone take to feel better?

Read more