No, not true. The brain is loaded and working 100% all the time.
The catch in your question is this: You believe that "the person uses the brain." In reality, the situation is, strictly speaking, the opposite: the brain uses a person)
That is, what you call a "person" is a phantom of consciousness, a kind of conventional construction that arose exclusively thanks to our second signal system, ability to verbal thinking. Yes, you can say to yourself "I am a human" and even say "I use the brain", but nowhere, outside of your words, nothing like that exists)
understand, try to ask yourself: is "I" using the body? Or is the body using "me" (notice the quotes)? It gets sick when it needs it, it gets old when it needs it, dies when it needs it ... Well, and how do I use it?
The picture is about the same with the brain: it is busy with what it is doing, and "you" are needed only in order to observe and reflect on this. But even not everyone is able to observe)
And the myth about 10 percent arose because of the entire volume of information about the world around us, which the brain receives and processes, we get to be aware of only a small part: the rest repressed into the unconscious or ignored altogether. What percentage of information you are able to understand - 3, 5, 10% - is determined exclusively by your social and cultural background, upbringing and education.
At the same time, only a very small part of the human brain is actively working, which can be observed on functional MRI tomograms. At the same time, it is wrong to think that this means that the brain is underutilized and it is possible to increase its performance by activating other zones. The point is that areas of the brain are specialized. When thinking about a sentence in a literary work, activating areas specialized in smell or the cerebellum, which stores motor motor responses, will not help you in any way. Or, when looking at a picture, activating the cortex responsible for lips and tongue will not help you.
Thinking that the brain has underutilized resources in the form of unactivated 90% of the brain is like thinking that a building is underutilized because that not all elevators run at the same time, not all washstands have water flowing, sprinklers of the fire extinguishing system are also ready, and do not spray water, and the fire alarm siren does not work around the clock.
Brain areas activate work in accordance with the task, currently running. It is quite logical that areas of the brain that are not related to this activity are in a state of low activity.
The myth that we use only 10% of the brain's capabilities is considered by the American psychologist William James. His phrase "The average person rarely achieves more than a fraction of his potential" was misinterpreted by journalists. And later it was picked up by businessmen who began to publish various books, educational games, pills and other rubbish, supposedly capable of enhancing human brain activity.
In reality, it is enough to conduct an MRI to make sure that even at rest our brain works hard ... Depending on the type of activity, certain parts of the brain are most active, but it is not necessary to say that 90% of the brain is in "hibernation". This does not mean that in the process of evolution our brain will not learn new tricks and techniques, but already now we are more than actively loading it and making it work around the clock.
There is a popular myth that our brain works by 10 percent and if you use the remaining 90, then humans will get super abilities. Film and TV series writers often exploit this misconception. In the future, I will rely on the book by Alexander Markov "Human Evolution. Monkeys, Neurons and Soul". Although you can also give a link to this article.
Our brain was formed during a long evolution and despite all the advantages it gives us, it has a number of significant disadvantages, for example, high energy consumption, our brain consumes a huge amount energy, plus because of our human brain, children remain helpless for too long, and so on. Therefore, it is very strange to imagine that in the course of evolutionary selection a model was formed when the bulk of resources are not used. It's like a cheetah could run 60 km per hour, but only run 6 km per hour. Evolution is a rather cruel and pragmatic thing, so 90 percent of the stock is too much of a burden.
In addition, our brain is constantly at work, although we are not aware of it, and its resources are spent on this invisible work and often they are not even enough.
This is a myth, there is a lot of information on this topic, where it is said that the brain uses almost all of its potential, it is just that different tasks require the activity of its different departments, so it uses exactly as much as is needed in this situation.
Here is a children's article to clarify the situation:
Is it true that we only use the brain by 10%?
It is believed that the human brain is involved us only by 10%. This is probably why a person cannot figure out how to develop him 100%. Question: why is the brain so arranged and how can you still make it work one hundred percent?
Fragment of the article: “In the middle of the last century it was completely incomprehensible how a person thinks (now this is also incomprehensible, but on a different level). But something was known - for example, that the brain is composed of neurons and that neurons can generate electrical signals.
Some scientists then believed that if a neuron generates an impulse , then it works , and if it does not generate, then it is "lazy". And then someone came up with the idea to check: how many neurons in the whole brain are "working", and how many are "beating out"?
There are several billion neurons in the brain, and it would be sheer madness to measure the activity of each of them - it would take many years. Therefore, instead of studying all neurons in a row, scientists examined only a small part of , determined the percentage of active among them and assumed that this percentage is the same throughout the brain (this assumption is called extrapolation).
And it turned out that it "works", i.e. generates impulses, only an indecently small percentage of neurons, and the rest are "silent". A little straightforward conclusion was drawn from this: silent neurons are bums , and the brain works only for a small part of its capabilities. "
C electroencephalograph :). From electrical activity, you can understand which areas are currently involved. The keywords are for the moment. That is, a smaller part will always be involved, but if we track the activity over a long period of time, the picture will change
In general, this is a very popular question on TQ
From a bad interpretation by "journalists" -popularizers of the facts of scientific research on electrical excitation of brain zones. I suspect they were told that the experiments recorded excitement in areas of the brain that make up about 10% of its total. But this fact does not mean that the remaining 90% remain inactive forever. This means that in other conditions, for example, other experiments, other areas and zones are active.
Nothing will happen, because this is fiction.
Many people share the misconception that the human brain works only 10%, while the other 90% remain unused. This is actually a myth. Our brain is an extremely efficient computing machine with an energy-efficient plan already in place.
A common myth claims that we use only 10% of our brain - the other 90% of the capacity is idle. Various charlatans in their books and methods promise to reveal the unused potential of the brain with the help of neuroscience - in fact, all this is deception.
Two-thirds of all people and slightly more than half of all teachers in the world believe in this myth. In the 1890s, William James, the father of American psychology, said: "Most of us do not use our mental potential." By these words he meant a challenge to our abilities, not their limitation, but the most popular was the misinterpretation of his words. It was supported by the fact that for a long time scientists could not understand the significance of the large, frontal and parietal lobes of the brain. Their injuries did not cause motor or sensory disruptions, so it was believed that they were doing nothing. For decades, these parts were called "quiet zones". We now know that they are responsible for rational thinking, planning, decision making and adaptation.
The idea that 90% of the brain is idle all the time seems absurd when you consider how much energy they consume. Rodents and mammals use 5% of the body's energy to support the brain, monkeys - 10%, an adult - 20%, and the brain occupies only 2% of his body, a child - 50%, and babies - 60%.
The human brain weighs 1.5 kg, the brain of the elephant is 5 kg, and the brain of the whale is 9 kg. We surpass any other living creature in the number of neural connections. This requires a lot of energy, which we can get with great advantage thanks to the invention of cooking. Food comes to us already prepared for digestion, so we can afford to contain a brain with 86 billion neurons - 40% more than in monkeys.
If all neurons in at least one part of the brain worked simultaneously, the total the energy load would be unbearable. Therefore, in the brain, only small sections of neurons are simultaneously involved, which are constantly replaced - this is called the method of discharged coding. It allows you to spend a minimum of energy, processing a maximum of information - from one to 16% of neurons are activated at a time. A person does not cope well with multitasking - we simply do not have enough energy to keep everything under control - as a result, we do each task worse than individually. If most neurons were not used, evolution would have gotten rid of unnecessary brain volume long ago.
In general, it has long been proven that a person uses not 10% of his brain, but literally the whole, just some more, some less. I think we can say that we use all the capabilities of the brain, that is, 100%
This is not true! The statement that the human brain works at 10% (5%, 3%) is an old, completely incorrect and completely indestructible myth. Let's figure out where it came from.
In the middle of the last century it was completely incomprehensible how a person thinks (now this is also incomprehensible, but at a different level). But something was known - for example, that the brain consists of neurons and that neurons can generate electrical signals.
Some scientists then believed that if a neuron generates an impulse, then it works, and if it does not generate, then , "Lazy". And then someone came up with the idea to check: how many neurons in the whole brain are “working”, and how many are “beating up”?
There are several billion neurons in the brain, and it would be sheer madness to measure the activity of each of them, it would take many years. Therefore, instead of studying all neurons in a row, scientists examined only a small part, determined the percentage of active among them and assumed that this percentage is the same throughout the brain (this assumption is called extrapolation).
And it turned out that “ works, ”that is, it generates impulses, only an indecently small percentage of neurons, and the rest are“ silent ”. From this, a somewhat straightforward conclusion was drawn: silent neurons are idlers, and the brain works only for a small part of its capabilities.
This conclusion was absolutely wrong, but since at that time it was customary to "correct nature", for example, turn rivers, irrigate deserts and drain seas, the idea that brain function can also be improved, stuck and began its triumphant march through newspaper pages and magazine spreads. Even now, something like this is sometimes found in the yellow press.
"The thesis about the use of the brain is 10% correct only for those who believe in it" - anecdote from the psychology department.
In fact, we really use only part of the brain power at a time. This is correct and normal, in the same way we do not use 100% of our facial muscles: when smiling, some work, while chewing cutlets, others. And what will a person's face look like if all muscles are tense at the same time? As bad as a 100% activated brain - this only happens with epilepsy
I must note that if scientists were able to measure how much% on average the brain works in a modern person, then they should have a standard from which to start (what to take as 100%.) I have not heard about super-people with 100% brain activity , and you? Apparently, the information is based on an assumption with a reference to some kind of study of the brain. It is doubtful that this information can be considered accurate due to the lack of an obvious comparison object.
The most common myth that a person uses his brain by 5-10% was launched (knowingly or unknowingly) a long time ago by one journalist. The myth was fueled by other media and all those who were not indifferent. If a person did not use his brain completely, he would be a vegetable. A person is born with almost zero knowledge and with a practically undeveloped brain, there are only instincts to suck and scream. During life, the brain develops and accumulates knowledge about the world around it. It cannot work not at full strength, and sometimes even more, when you have some kind of active thinking process. No wonder the brain is one of the most resource-demanding organs (consumes up to 30% of the energy of the whole body). So, do not believe the myths and read more of the necessary literature.
If, however, the verb "comprehend" in the sense of "study" and not a person, but humanity, then, I think, most of the brain functions (and its organs, parts) are already well studied. I am sure they will study it in full soon :)
TheQuestion: we will find those who will answer your questions.
Personally, I use my brain 100%. I know people who don't use it at all. Can I have the exclusive right to answers less than 140 characters for such cases?
There were more repetitions
No, not true. The parts of the human brain perform different functions (bit.ly), so most of it is used for full-fledged life. Scientific American magazine published an article refuting the myth (bit.ly), the essence of the arguments in which boils down to the following positions:
The idea that only 10% of the brain is used is a psychological delusion based on a misconception about the structure of this organ.
Brain weight is about 3% of the total body weight. Moreover, it consumes more oxygen than any other organ. Therefore, the brain can be called one of the most "productive" human organs.
At different times, certain parts of the brain are active, but in general, the whole brain does its work 100% during the day.
Strange statement of the question. The human brain is used to its fullest, just that part of the brain's activity that is somehow combined with consciousness is really small, which is 10%, and 1% will not be typed. However, the brain is busy all the time. Breathing, coordination of movements, internal secretion - all the time the brain is doing something.
Maybe the author wanted to ask how effectively people use their brains? But here, too, it will not work to give any unambiguous answer. Both memory and the ability for analytics / abstraction / fantasy are developed in everyone to varying degrees and it is absolutely impossible to say that someone does not use their brains. Everyone uses their brains to the full, it's just that the methods of operation and the tasks assigned are different for everyone. And, believe me, a Nobel laureate or a chess player does not use their brains any more intensively than an elderly proletarian or a young amphetamine addict who is peacefully drinking alcohol. It's just that most likely you like more the result of mental work that Nobel laureates and chess players generate.
The assertion that a person does not use the full potential of his brain (in different variations from 5% to 30%) is just a journalistic tale, refuted by scientists many times. Almost all areas in the brain are constantly active, not without exceptions, of course, but this is due to energy savings, but not by the "possible potential of the superintelligence", which we do not use.
And here is the specific answer to the question: Yes , a person is able to use more than 30% of his brain. And he does it all the time.
But you shouldn't take Luc Besson's word for it. Indeed, in theory (although this cannot be called a theory) of his film "Lucy", all mankind is already at the stage of black slime.
Despite the fact that the question is an ancient false meme, after all:
If the brain had unused resources, they would simply die off. As it happens in reality. Statistics show that among scientists, musicians, chess players, the phenomenon of senile dementia develops less frequently.
For example, elementary: blogspot.fr
So the brain has no unused, but it has resources development, it is possible and useful to develop.
Able and uses, including you. At least because otherwise evolution would "cut off" the extra part, because our brain is already very voracious in the consumption of resources (especially energy). But abilities will not increase. Moreover, if you use all one hundred percent in general at the same time, that is, at all at one point in time and absolutely all areas and connections in the brain, we will get an epileptic seizure - probably a cool ability. In general, do not believe the ancient journalistic myths. You have no "parasites" in your brain.
A person always uses almost all of his brain. Even in a dream, you remember, analyze the events of the past day. Also, the brain constantly monitors heartbeat, breathing and other vital functions.
Tales about the use of the brain by 5, 8, 10 and 50 percent are true delirium, refuted hundreds of times
Was "Lucy" reconsidered with the case?
In general, this is a very popular myth.
Wikipedia has 5 refutations of this fact, I will give the most important arguments:
Evolution. The brain consumes a huge amount of oxygen and nutrients. If a person used only 5% of his brain, then the remaining 95 would be left without use, therefore, why? Nature would remove the unnecessary part through evolution.
Various scans of brain activity refute this myth, in any case (even in a dream) a person uses much more of his brain's resources. Exception: people with brain damage and various diseases.
When we are talking about certain percentages of the human brain, we are not talking about the remaining ≈90% being some kind of hidden resource not revealed by evolution. And we are talking only about the number of neurons unused at the moment, so at the same time all neurons cannot be involved, but this is always a different ten percent: neurons cannot transmit a signal continuously. Rather, intelligence is influenced by the number of connections between brain cells.
As for dolphins, most of the brain's resources go to the creation of echolocation maps, the constant processing of these volumetric models of space. It makes no sense to talk about percentages - you need to talk about the specialization of the brain, its capabilities, but, speaking of specialization, do not consider individual zones that are supposedly responsible for a specific type of activity (according to the latest data, the whole brain is involved in each type of activity, but some of its parts have slightly more activity), and the entire central nervous system as a whole. We are only approaching a complete understanding of all the mechanisms of thought processes at the cognitive and biological levels. When we reach this understanding, the creation of humanoid computers will be an elementary matter.
Hmm ... Formally, Gennady's answer is absolutely accurate. But he, as a programmer, could be close to the analogy between the brain and the computer - with the difference that the brain processes information not only with the help of linear logic.
If you look at the work of the brain functionally - from the point of view of processing information, and superimpose it on our ideas about neurophysiology, you can think of many interesting things.
One of the consequences will be the fact that all neurons cannot be activated, if only because the signal transmitted in the form of nerve impulses switches between different paths. And two competing tracks cannot be active at the same time - like a train that only goes along one track from the switch and cannot do otherwise.
This is a popular myth. All nerve cells of the brain work in humans. But not at the same time. The set of neurons active at each moment depends on the information that the brain processes. Activating all neurons at the same time would be completely meaningless.
Imagine a printed page: ink occupies just about 10% of the surface on it. The rest is white paper. Does this mean that the text takes up only 10% of the page? If the paper is completely filled with ink, then there will no longer be any useful information on it.
But if we can fill the paper with ink, although this does not make any sense, then the activation of all brain neurons at the same time is impossible, since this not enough resources - the brain simply does not receive enough oxygen and nutrients to be enough for everyone.
In addition, it is useful to mention another popular misconception: that intellectual work consumes a lot of energy. In fact, studies have shown that the energy consumption of the brain is practically unchanged - the brain is never at rest. That is, it doesn't matter what is printed on the sheet of paper - the proof of Fermat's theorem, or a stupid anecdote. Anyway, the sheet is filled by the same 10%.
The statement that the brain works at 5/7/10 percent is a lie.
Each part of the brain has a specific function, in the process of research has not yet found a region of the brain that would not do anything.
MRI and research have shown that even during sleep, all parts of the brain show a certain level of activity. This means that the brain works at 100%.
Only due to damage, any part of the brain may not work.
In fact, the brain is used at full capacity. But only part of it is perceived, remembered. Therefore, there is a statement that the brain is used by 7-8%
I will support Ahezana, Lucy's film, the brain has a huge potential for opportunities, we just do not use and do not develop it, if we used it 100 percent there was no opportunity to improve and develop it, we simply would not have the potential for development. We live bally, sorry, of course, but stereotyped, for this the brain does not need a lot of resources.
Watch Lucy's movie
This is really so
We are humans in the process of evolution
We are very young for the universe
we are still 6 billion years old (until the sun becomes a giant) so YES this is real
The work of our brain is especially in the analysis and awareness of 4 dimensions: width, length, height and time, and all through 100% of the work of certain parts of the brain at different times. 10% is the total aggregate of the brain.
If the total aggregate were to increase, even purely theoretically, to 100%, then all parts of the brain that would function simultaneously would create the following phenomena: all the senses of the body intensified, sensation of the body, muscles , tendons, nerves increased, there was an awareness not only of our dimensions, but also, possibly, of other etheric, subtle ones, due to the intensified feelings.
The most important thing, of course, is full awareness of the 4th dimension - time: we would be aware that we are simultaneously in all times at the same time, and as for us time would become not a line, but a point.
But in this case, in practice, it would not work, since the brain would simply would have fried.
It's like with muscles. Our brains are much more powerful than we imagine. But he deliberately limits himself so that we don't go crazy.
Don't build illusions. A person uses only 10% of the capabilities of the brain. Using the brain 100%, I can't even imagine, it will be something amazing and terrifying. But in fact, we do not use even half of the capabilities of our brain.
No. A person uses different capabilities of his brain at different times. Those. When solving a certain problem, a person uses a certain part of the brain. Thus, we use all the capabilities of the brain, but not simultaneously.
wikipedia.org - Myth about 10% of the brain used
There is a well-established idea that people use their brain only 10% and if they learned to use it 100%, they would become omniscient scientists or supermen (like the heroine of Luc Besson's film "Lucy").
However, this is a myth, and a person who is awake seems to use 100% of his brain. As you know, evolution does nothing in vain. A large amount of energy is required to ensure the functioning of the human brain (about 20% of the total energy of the adult body). As a result of natural selection, our brain would never have reached such an impressive size, would not have acquired such a complex structure and would not have become such an energy-consuming organ, if it were not necessary.
neuroscience data: there is not a single area of the brain, the damage of which would remain without consequences for the body, and various methods of scanning the activity of the whole brain as a whole and of its individual cells showed that a certain function is assigned to each of the brain areas and unused areas are simply not exists.
All of the above does not negate the fact that it is in our power to develop mental abilities and use the brain more efficiently.