How can a person who does not believe in God live? .... bad .... God created this world according to his own laws and for Christians, and all atheists in it are strangers ..... an atheist himself found scientific facts in order to to suffer all my life .... smart or what?
Many scientists are convinced that without the existence of God, nothing would exist. But they talk about it differently. Someone calls the Creator - the Supreme Reason, someone - the Higher Power. And the Bible says: "You are worthy, O Lord, to receive glory and honor, power, for You created everything, and everything exists and was created according to Your will." (Revelation 4:11).
Even those who completely deny the existence of God use the laws that He created. Not a single scientist said: "I created a chemical, mathematical law." They said: "I discovered the law." Because these laws were created long before they were discovered. The Bible agrees with science. For example, the fact that the earth is round, and not flat and hangs on anything, was recorded almost 8 centuries before the birth of Jesus Christ. And people were convinced of this quite recently. So from the point of view of science - it is impossible to explain that there is no God.
Live as you want. The fact that you can explain "everything" logically says only that you successfully avoid what you cannot explain, but explain all the nonsense that is not worth considering.
You can only explain what you can realize. This is where you are limited.
Science can not explain everything, and even these "explanations" are usually far-fetched. Relying on science is thus risky. But you have no choice, because you are blind.
If you cannot see yourself! ...
Be smart further, what else remains for you.
Live in a scientific way and do not be foolish (such questions). And since you ask them, then you can't explain everything in a scientific way. At least in such a way that it completely satisfies you and gives "peace to the tortured soul." If the second is true, then you can't lie, as if you can explain everything scientifically.
And in what does he himself see his problem? Is he a bore that no one wants to hang out with? Well: you need different people, such a mindset can also be useful to people and please God - you need to look for your place, find your business. For spiritual development, he can be advised to go in for sports, communicate with people and read fiction - the power of art can open the eyes of many to the true nature of reality, while science only glides on its surface.
Elementary: ask on the Internet a question like "riddles to which science has no answer", ask how many of these riddles are, understand that you, in fact, cannot explain everything scientifically by yourself, and devote life to the search for scientific answers.
I can give a hint: find the answer, how the bombardier beetle appeared. He is one of those animals that, by his very existence, cuts the entire classical theory of evolution to the root and makes it possible to assume that he was created either by God or by some higher civilization, to whose technologies we still have to grow and grow (and these are unscientific answers)
So, what's the catch: there is a camera inside the beetle in the abdomen. There are three glands adjacent to it, which produce three gases. Relatively speaking A, B, C. If you mix gases A and B, then an explosion occurs. But if gas C is present in the mixture, then it inhibits the reaction. A mixture of three gases is constantly in the beetle's abdomen. Moreover, in strict proportion. Therefore, the beetle does not explode. In case of danger, the beetle shoots a mixture at the enemy. In this case, the light gas C instantly evaporates, and the remaining two gases explode, inflicting burns on the enemy of the beetle. You can watch it on YouTube, where you can see that such an explosion-shot leaves black spots on the paper. Now the question is: how could such a complex mezanism have developed in a beetle if, according to the theory of evolution, new organs appear very slowly, through the random appearance, consolidation and accumulation of random useful mutations. After all, the slightest "flaw" in the mechanism of the bombardier beetle (and this would be inevitable if the mechanism was formed by evolution) would lead to the death of the beetle. And it would not have arisen as a species.
Think, seek the answer.
Yes, you are a genius as I see it: the greatest scientists of the world cannot explain everything from the point of view of science, hundreds of thousands of scientists speculate, expensive devices are being built in order to unravel the mysteries of the universe, and at this time you can explain everything scientifically. Can you share with the rest of the scientists, but the fact that they are wasting time.
Well, okay, that's enough, don't be offended by my words, I didn't want to offend you, I just wanted to say that the opinion that science can explain everything - it's a delusion. That is why science exists, scientists work - because we still do not know everything and can explain. Therefore, I am very funny when Dawkins declares that he brings people the truth, as if he had already learned all the secrets of the universe. I recommend that you read about modern unsolved mysteries of science, find out what scientists are fighting now, believe you, you will immediately cease to be bored and an amazing world of the unknown will open before you, which cannot be explained scientifically and you will have to make your own assumptions about how the world works, and perhaps one the possible explanations would be the existence of a higher mind. I generally do not think that religion and science are incompatible, the more you learn about the universe, the more you find orderliness and reasonableness in it, which cannot be attributed to chance. So the fact that you do not belong to any of the religious denominations does not make your life empty, there is much that may surprise you.
Let me give you an example: galaxies form clusters of galaxies, which in turn form superclusters. So superclusters of galaxies revolve around one center. Imagine something with the power to pull superclusters of galaxies made up of trillions of stars. Even black holes don't have this gravitational pull. Scientists have no idea what it is, they call it the Great Attractor. "Great Amount", isn't it mesmerizing!
In the sense of "how to live"? People lived calmly and live without faith in gods, the heart from this does not stop pumping blood, oxygen gets into the lungs, the stomach to digest food. I would like to understand what problem the author of the question sees in the ability to explain life phenomena scientifically and why this should interfere with life.
If we exclude the option that the question contains a false premise and the person you are talking about cannot really explain everything scientifically, then there is only one option - this person takes for scientific what is not actually scientific. In this case, I recommend reading the book by I. Lakatos "Selected Works on the Philosophy and Methodology of Science". In particular, there are examples of things that are beyond scientific competence, and therefore cannot be explained scientifically.