Circumcised at 33. The skin was delicate rubbed during intercourse from friction of the foreskin along the rim of the head. The sensitivity during sex did not decrease, the sensitivity decreased with the usual touch of the penis to the underwear.
But from a purely aesthetic point of view, I liked being more with the foreskin =)
The penis looks more aesthetically pleasing. And besides, it is hygiene.
In medicine, it is said about the prevention of cancer of the "foreskin".
Then it’s a matter of technology, who like
During sex, the edge of the head of the circumcised penis does not interfere with sliding along the walls of the vagina, so if this edge itself is elastic enough, and the vagina is sensitive enough, you can experience a rather pleasant additional stimulation, which, for example, when having sex with the presence of foreskin, I never felt it. Unlike ... well, you get the idea.
In the rest and everything else, for a woman, probably, there will be no difference, except for her own aesthetic preferences.
For me, the foreskin is a bit of a fetish; I find this part of the penis intrinsic and very exciting. Due to her, the penis looks different depending on whether he is erect or not, and this is very sexy. Therefore, I do not like the idea of circumcision of the foreskin without medical indications.
I heard that as a result of this operation, the sensitivity of the head decreases and as a result, the duration of intercourse increases. But I think it's not worth it.